Tuesday, June 18, 2019
Was the suspension of habeas corpus by Jefferson Davis necessary Research Paper
Was the prisonbreak of habeas corpus by Jefferson Davis necessary - Research Paper useIt is thus imperative to begin with a detailed explanation of the meaning and key concepts of habeas corpus. Habeas corpus is a writ founded on the legal doctrine of an accuse persons entitlement to a fair trial. Its essence is that a person deserves to be tried before an open court of law where he spate respond to the charges presented before him as an accused person. It is therefore a court order to show cause as to the purpose and a justification for the condition of the accused person. When presented before a court of law, the state is required to bring forth a prisoner held in custody so that the court can de boundine the lawfulness of the detention.2 It is for this reason that Habeas corpus is considered to be among the cornerstones of American civil liberties and has been used extensively as a powerful safeguard against unlawful arrests. The term habeas corpus originates from the Latin maxim to produce the body of, whereby habeas loosely translates to you have and corpus refers to the body. The writ can be traced as far back as the British occupation of the United States. However, the most accurate detailed explanation of its origin is found in the British Magna Carta. ... The American Constitution allows for the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus in cases of rebellion or the invasion of the public safety.4 Under the American history, the writ has been suspended severally, especially during the American civil war. The first suspension of the writ took place in 1861, where electric chair Abraham Lincoln authorized a suspension of the writ upon the outbreak of riots, threats of succession and resident militia actions.5 Even then, this generated a public outcry in which the Maryland courts challenged the suspension of the writ.6 President Jefferson Davis repeated the same act upon the emergence of the American civil war. However, his suspension of the writ duri ng the fusion period earned him a lot mob criticism. This is because not only did he suspend the writ once, but also sought to seek the telephone extension of the suspension through congress. Unlike in the north where the suspension arose from civil unrest, the suspension of the writ in the south was mainly to spur economic ripening that had been rampaged by the economic crisis of the south. Partly to blame for the extension of the suspension was the reasoning, by Jefferson Davis, that winning the confederacy war and uniting the northern and southern states was his priority. The extension of the warriorlike law was just but the means to win the war over the south and return the south to economic prosperity. This therefore meant that when the attention of the world was upon the Confederacy, President Davis focus was solely upon how to win the war, no matter what it took and any step towards achieving this objective was acceptable. Jefferson Davis and the Confederacy The American civil war emerged as a get by to preserve the union that was the United States of America.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.